Page 5 - a past present and future

“And that would give the reason to those who maintain

that there was no participation of scheduled flights in the
attacks and that the television images that we have all seen

are only a crude and interested montage,” she added.

“I, personally, discard all theories that speak of actions

perpetrated by missiles or drones. But is also true that the
images showing the first impact on the North Tower are not

as sharp as we would in terms of the aircraft that produces
them and that the dimension of the damage to the tower

structure does not correspond to the actual width and length
of the wings of the American Airlines commercial flight

AA-11,” David admitted. “And what do you think? I

haven’t heard your opinion so far.”

“I am not inclined to defend the theory of drone or
missile intervention either. It seems very fanciful and very

unreal to me. I believe that the extend or dimension of the

damage to the towers could have been conditioned precisely
by the resistance of the buildings’ own steel structures. I

think they were able to bend and fold the plane’s wings in
a certain way and this reduced the extend of the damage

caused,” Jennifer explained.

“What do you think about the theory that the

explosions were caused from inside the buildings?” He
asked.

“This possibility would lead us again to consider that

the presence of airplanes is just a setup,” she argued.